Call Search
     

New to Ham Radio?
My Profile

Community
Articles
Forums
News
Reviews
Friends Remembered
Strays
Survey Question

Operating
Contesting
DX Cluster Spots
Propagation

Resources
Calendar
Classifieds
Ham Exams
Ham Links
List Archives
News Articles
Product Reviews
QSL Managers

Site Info
eHam Help (FAQ)
Support the site
The eHam Team
Advertising Info
Vision Statement
About eHam.net

donate to eham
   Home   Help Search  
Pages: Prev 1 [2]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Anyone else find it frustrating FT9 and NO QSL info?  (Read 953 times)
K0UA
Member

Posts: 1465




Ignore
« Reply #15 on: December 05, 2017, 01:16:38 PM »

"Is it just me or do you find it frustrating that people use FT8 and do not QSL in ANY manner?"

The LOTW web site shows that K1JT hasn't uploaded to LOTW in over 23 months. Since FT8 was given its wide release only this past July, I guess Joe has set the standard for electronic qsls for this mode.

My own impression has been that JT65, JT9 and FT8 contacts have all been confirmed at a rather high rate on lotw and on eqsl.

Dave, N6ORB




Isn't that interesting.  I see what you are seeing about K1JT's last upload, yet I have worked him 3 times and I guess I have not got confirmation on LOTW from him, see below.  I never noticed that before.


Station
Call Sign       K0UA
DXCC       UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
CQ Zone       4
ITU Zone       7
Grid       EM36JQ
State       Missouri (MO)
County       TANEY
Worked Station
Worked       K1JT
Date/Time       2017-08-23 00:45:30
Mode       FT8 (DATA)
Band       80M
Frequency       3.57445
Record ID 857221201 Received: 2017-08-23 03:48:04

« Last Edit: December 05, 2017, 01:20:25 PM by K0UA » Logged
Pages: Prev 1 [2]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!