- Amateur Radio (Ham Radio) Community

Call Search

New to Ham Radio?
My Profile

Friends Remembered
Survey Question

DX Cluster Spots

Ham Exams
Ham Links
List Archives
News Articles
Product Reviews
QSL Managers

Site Info
eHam Help (FAQ)
Support the site
The eHam Team
Advertising Info
Vision Statement

Reviews Categories | Antennas: HF: Verticals; Wire; Loop | Diamond CP6 multi-band trap-vertical Help

Reviews Summary for Diamond CP6 multi-band trap-vertical
Diamond CP6 multi-band trap-vertical Reviews: 45 Average rating: 3.8/5 MSRP: $320
Description: The CP6 is a multi-band trap-vertical antenna for HF bands, covering the 80*, 40, 20, 15, 10 & 6m amateur bands. Made from heavy-duty aluminum, the CP6 is easily assembled, yielding excellent performance and reliability from a compact base station.
*80m CW only. SSB requires a tuner.

This product has been discontinued.
Product is in production.
More info:
Email Subscription
You are not subscribed to this review.

My Subscriptions
Subscriptions Help

You can write your own review of the Diamond CP6 multi-band trap-vertical.

Page 1 of 5 —>

G6YXV Rating: 4/5 Aug 14, 2019 13:08 Send this review to a friend
Good for the money  Time owned: 6 to 12 months
OK so the "money" was zero, this came pre-owned with the pre-owend rig!
An old antenna that had had lots of repairs done and was showing it's age, cut my teeth on HF with this so steep learning curve with tuning, ongoing repairs, quite easy to dismantle as I had radials just above head height and could lower down and reach each section to dismantle. Never could get all 6 bands tuned at the same time, I'd get three in SWR then the other 3 would drop out...... But in all of that year or so of owning got some great experience and contacts over the pond and Russia etc. Good thing with a vertical is no tower or rotator to worry about, however with 200w limit I flogged it for 100 and switched to a beam to get more gain. I would seriously think of getting another, maybe the CP5 with higher power......
EI5KF Rating: 0/5 Mar 6, 2018 11:57 Send this review to a friend
Don't buy  Time owned: more than 12 months
Unfortunately my experience has been bad. The traps are poorly constructed and fail in the wind. I've a useless heap of scrap.
MI0GTA Rating: 5/5 Mar 9, 2016 11:43 Send this review to a friend
wait and see  Time owned: 0 to 3 months
great, on the strength of the cp-5 I used some years ago when first licensed..

I've reordered a cp-6 today so it'll be a few mths before it's in the air..
Hopefully it'll do the job the cp-5 did back in 2002.
with th cp-5 I didn't have any issues, no faulty traps, no problems with swr.

at the moment I'm using a vertical delta loop from prowhip, and to be honest it failed within the first 12hrs it was in the air...

I replaced the wire, 24mts of it with a slightly heavier gauge wire and removed the plastic pole holders and replaced them with aluminium pole holders wrapped in insulating tape and a double u bolt on each holder, so it's been repaired and it work's fine now and resonant on 15m band...

i'll update this later re the cp-6..
VK2HFY Rating: 2/5 Aug 23, 2015 03:54 Send this review to a friend
Great concept, weakness in capacitive hats rusting at connectio  Time owned: more than 12 months
Concept of antenna is great and trapped radial elements are useful when used in areas where real estate is limited.

After six months of use, I noticed that the capacitive hat radials towards the top of the antenna that were seemingly manufactured from a thin stainless steel tube with a threaded connection point at one end were rusting at the connection to the antenna.

I was stunned to discover that the threaded connection point to the alumninum ring holder was a MILD STEEL stub (with kurled edge and thread on one end) that was inserted into the end of each capacitive hat radial. I verified that the mild steel was attracted to magnets and therefore must have contained iron. Being dissimilar to metals around it, this promoted a galvanic effect and rust.... Difficult to detect when inspecting a new antenna as it appears that the entire assembly is stainless.

Surely all CP-6 antenna's if manufactured this way will rust and this is a potential (even likely?) point of failure in time both structurally and electrically.

Photos are here:
JO3SLK Rating: 5/5 Oct 13, 2012 01:08 Send this review to a friend
Great performance  Time owned: more than 12 months
I have had the CP-6 for a couple of years and really like it. The antenna is very easy to assemble and tune. The performance has been outstanding, working all over the world. I am not a contester but I "hunt and pounce" on stations that I have not worked before. I have gotten through to some rare stations that were very busy, even with the 100 watt IC-7200 I have.

I have also been through several typhoons and the antenna has survived very well. I would recommend the CP-6 and would buy it again if I ever needed a replacement.

I use a RigExpert AA230 Pro to tune it to the portion of the band I will normally work and the antenna then just performs....

I have never had any problem with the construction of the antenna or the traps.

If you are looking for a good 6 band vertical that is easy to install, holds up well in adverse weather and performs well, this is an antenna to consider.
GM4LER Rating: 0/5 Oct 2, 2012 14:31 Send this review to a friend
Absolutly Rubbish  Time owned: more than 12 months
This antenna is the worst piece of kit that I have ever bought.

It cannot stand up to any wx ,it's not water proof & traps built far to flimsy to remain operational after any wind ,

Probably ok for occasional portable use ,but do not rely that it will work as the connections in the traps are very fragile
G3EJS Rating: 0/5 Aug 13, 2012 01:52 Send this review to a friend
Very poor build quality  Time owned: more than 12 months
I bought this six years ago to try and get active on HF from a very small garden, after being used to used to almost unlimited antenna space.

At first I thought it was great, seemed to work OK, but the only thing I had to compare it with was a piece of wire.

Went together OK, had to remove all but one of the top rods to get it to work on 80,

After about 18 months, I noticed the "sway" in the wind was jerky, very soon after that it stopped working.
As others have found, the construction of the traps is atrocious.

After repair it lasted a bit longer, but the plastic inside the trap is soft, and eventually it failed again, but the more holes you add for more repairs, the weaker it gets.

Last week I took it down and put up a Moonraker 2500. Although the Moonraker doesn't seem to get good reviews, it is a lot better than the CP6, signals well up, and hugely quieter regarding background noise (mainly local domestic)

The CP6 is sold in the UK as a quality antenna, at a high price. The quality is appalling, and it is worth about a third of the selling price. Now the price may be high due to large profits by the UK dealers, or maybe it is expensive from Diamond, but either way allowing for the quality and price it can only have a zero rating, comparing it with other makes like my TH3Jnr, which at 30 years old is still good.
KB9MLE Rating: 5/5 Mar 25, 2012 12:55 Send this review to a friend
Great antenna  Time owned: more than 12 months
Have had the Diamond CP-6 up for over 10 years. Has worked very well. I'm starting to notice problems with my radio not being able to TX full power. Will have to look into this to find out what the problem is.
EI5KF Rating: 4/5 Jan 16, 2012 11:18 Send this review to a friend
Diamond CP6  Time owned: 6 to 12 months
CP6 cont'd......
After problems found with traps, contacted Diamond Japan, with issue of QC. New trap shipped with correct construction.
Thanks Diamaond
EI5KF Rating: 2/5 Dec 27, 2011 16:51 Send this review to a friend
Good antenna, poor QC from Diamond  Time owned: 3 to 6 months
I purchased a CP6 in July of 2011. After getting my licence in August, I commissioned the antenna and worked satisfactory on 5 band (no tx on 6m)

After 2-3 months noticed a change in VSWR on most bands above 10m, then 10m when bad.

Eventually, I got the antenna down and checked the antenna out. Sure enough, O/C in the 1st trap. Dismantled antenna and trap. Found broken connection on bottom of 10m coil and bottom of 15m coil at earthing point. These breaks were basically down to bad design and construction of the trap. Only 2 rivits are used to secure the trap insulatated former to the aluminium sections. These rivits are only seperated by 45 deg, which results in a lot of play and movement of parts in the wind and snap! If Diamond had put 4 rivits at 90 deg spacing, no issue. Drilling thru and puting extra rivets solves the problem, re-assemble and away you go.

Now you have a damb good antenna which does not need a ground and is suited to restricted spaces.

With this modification done, I would give the antenna a 5, but as it is bad QC from Diamond it gets a 2.

Best Regards,
Page 1 of 5 —>

If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions about Reviews, please email your Reviews Manager.