- Amateur Radio (Ham Radio) Community

Call Search

New to Ham Radio?
My Profile

Friends Remembered
Survey Question

DX Cluster Spots

Ham Exams
Ham Links
List Archives
News Articles
Product Reviews
QSL Managers

Site Info
eHam Help (FAQ)
Support the site
The eHam Team
Advertising Info
Vision Statement

Reviews Categories | Antennas: VHF/UHF+ Omnidirectional: verticals, mobile, etc | Cushcraft AR-270 Dual Band Ringo 2m/70cm Help

Reviews Summary for Cushcraft AR-270 Dual Band Ringo 2m/70cm
Cushcraft AR-270 Dual Band Ringo 2m/70cm Reviews: 27 Average rating: 4.1/5 MSRP: $89.99
Description: VHF/UHF Base antenna
Product is in production.
More info:
Email Subscription
You are not subscribed to this review.

My Subscriptions
Subscriptions Help

You can write your own review of the Cushcraft AR-270 Dual Band Ringo 2m/70cm.

Page 1 of 3 —>

KB6HRT Rating: 5/5 Apr 30, 2019 04:46 Send this review to a friend
WINNER  Time owned: more than 12 months
Retired in 1990 and with in a year I put up the 3 1/2' AR270 while living in Las Vagus NV In 2004 I moved to SUN CITY, AZ brough a new Comit 2n/440 fiberglass antenna to replace the AR270 so last year went up on the roof to change out the antenna an coax, but upon inspection of the AR270 it look Great, so I gave my the replacement antenna to a friend who has a need fo it The AR270 has always done the job for this ham's station...............73s..............kb6hrt
WD40 Rating: 5/5 Nov 21, 2018 06:32 Send this review to a friend
Great VHF/UHF antenna  Time owned: more than 12 months
This is my third AR270, I have 3 different operating locations and for ease of installation, performance and longevity they can't be beat. Over the years the quality of workmanship has improved but so has the price but then so has everything else. I highly recommend this antenna if for only the ease of installation and performance. It's a winner in my book!
K6JM Rating: 5/5 Apr 2, 2011 15:13 Send this review to a friend
Excellent dual bander for its small size  Time owned: more than 12 months
I've had the 3.75 foot tall AR-270 up for 8 years. It has stood up well to the weather, and continues to perform well. Taller antennas will have more gain, but for the size, the AR-270 does great. No complaints.
AI4WM Rating: 4/5 May 9, 2010 16:47 Send this review to a friend
Nice antenna  Time owned: more than 12 months
First, the photo shows an AR-270B. The 270B is much taller than the 270. There needs to be 2 review sections to distinguish between the 2.
I bought the AR-270 a few years ago to use as an antenna in my jump kit. However our local work is all done on VHF. I used this antenna on VHF only for a few years and then retuned it for both bands and permanently installed it about 6 months ago for dual band use. The antenna performs fine on 2 meters with 3.3 dB gain and on UHF with 5.5 dB gain. Material and construction quality is fine with the antenna if only the manufacturer used a better method to connect the coax to the antenna and use N instead of UHF connectors. The reason the antenna earns a 4.
For those who need a nice compact antenna for emergency deployment this is a nice compact easy to use antenna. VHF tuning went fine and is flat at 1.1:1 to about 1.5:1 worst case across the band. UHF is not linear with high SWR near the band ends and in the middle best is 1.5:1 and the peaks about 2:1
KC2VOB Rating: 5/5 Aug 16, 2009 06:22 Send this review to a friend
Excellent Antenna  Time owned: 6 to 12 months
Please differentiate between AR-270 and AR-270B. I got AR270B at a height of about 50í, fed with 75í Times Microwave LMR400. The setup does an excellent performance with very low loss both on 2m & 70cm. It enables me to make contacts through a 2m repeater located about 70 miles from me with an S9 on receive. May be itís assisted by the sunny and hot weather here. As for 70cm, I got a Motorola GP300 programmed to 440 for portable use. I was able to make contacts with home at a range of 4-5 miles with plenty elevations & exposed power lines. One a hilly peak, behind a mountain, I was able to make contact at a distance of about 20 miles. From my experiment, Diamond V2000 and AR270B electrically compare side by side on amateur bands. Whatís more interesting about Cushcraftís ringo antennas is that their length can be adjusted to desired frequencies. Speaking of strength, AR-270B has stood one full season of the daily monsoon windstorms in S Asia. I posted a video of mine on YouTube under my call sign KC2VOB.
K3DLB Rating: 5/5 Jul 23, 2008 16:31 Send this review to a friend
Perfect For Indoor Use  Time owned: more than 12 months
I've had very good luck with this antenna. I have it mounted to a vent pipe on the roof of my townhouse. It was easy to assemble and works great on both bands. Also, it's perfect for indoor use if you have antenna restrictions.
W3RXO Rating: 3/5 Apr 18, 2008 20:31 Send this review to a friend
I wish this site distinguished between the AR270, and AR270B  Time owned: more than 12 months
I had an AR270, and was very disappointed with it, after a short time. It just didn't have the quality parts, and fell apart, after less than a year. I had a friend with an AR 270B, who had upgraded to a Diamond, and didn't need the 270B. The "B" has been in service now, for about 14 months, and is still doing well, for an antenna that was likely a year, or more old, when I got it. It certainly is a better antenna than the 270. I gave an overall rating of 3, as the 270 should get a 2 and the 270B should get a 4, in my opinion.
K4JC Rating: 3/5 Jan 31, 2008 14:39 Send this review to a friend
OK on 2m, great UHF dummy load!  Time owned: more than 12 months
I've had the AR-270 for several years in different locations, and have found it works fine on 2 meters, with performance equivalent to a 1/2-wave antenna. The performance on 440, however, is pretty poor. When compared to a 1/4-wave ground plane under similar conditions, the ground plane consistently outperforms the Cushcraft. The only advantage is the AR-270's size. It's small and light, and fits nicely in an attic as an emergency/backup antenna. But for the same (or less) money, I think you would be better off getting a Comet GP-1 or Diamond X-30A.
NB7I Rating: 3/5 Sep 3, 2007 05:38 Send this review to a friend
Works, but why bother?  Time owned: more than 12 months
Had a AR-270B up for about 7 years. Replaced it with a Diamond X50A after the Cushcraft corroded/loosened up/quit working on 440. The Diamond is a much better antenna for harsh enviroments, and the same price.
WA0KAQ Rating: 5/5 Apr 17, 2007 09:35 Send this review to a friend
Works great!  Time owned: more than 12 months
I've run the AR-270 both as a portable and fixed antenna, and for the money, I love it. It is small in size, yet I can work mobiles at 35 miles or more with it running about 40 watts on 2 meters, and it is mounted at only 15' - just barely clearing the roof top (darn antenna restrictions here). I've now had it installed permanently for 3 years without a problem. The two meter section seems to work better than the 70 cm, but there's always a bit of trade-off when using multi-band antennas.

I also have the AR-270B (the big brother to the AR-270) available for ECOMM work, as it boasts a little more gain. It has worked great in that capacity.
Page 1 of 3 —>

If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions about Reviews, please email your Reviews Manager.