Manager - NA4M
Manager Notes

Reviews For: Comet 4 Ele. 6M Beam.

Category: Antennas: VHF/UHF+ Directional (Yagi, quad, etc.)

eMail Subscription

Registered users are allowed to subscribe to specific review topics and receive eMail notifications when new reviews are posted.
Review Summary For : Comet 4 Ele. 6M Beam.
Reviews: 11MSRP: 129.95
Wide Band 6 Meter Beam
Product is in production
More Info:
# last 180 days Avg. Rating last 180 days Total reviews Avg. overall rating
AK6ZZ Rating: 2014-10-04
Super light weight easy to assemble Time Owned: 0 to 3 months.
I bought the 6m comet yagi for my new QTH as my other six meter options are way to big and heavy for this new rental location. Assembled from box to mast In less than one hour it was easy and up and running at 1.8:1 swr. Not bad. Will adjust later down the road. I think this a great antenna and option for someone in my situation who needs basically a portable antenna for 6m but doesn't want to settle for the smaller Moxon or a M2 loop. Has good gain and F/B ratio in comparison to a Moxon and probably would weigh about the same depending on which Moxon you build.
K4FLH Rating: 2012-08-30
Love it Time Owned: more than 12 months.
I've owned this antenna for 3 and a half years and it's still working as it should.
I see people say the antenna is "flimsy", "mechanically poor",etc.. Well, I'm here to tell you they aren't. You've heard the old adage, "Looks are decieving." In this case that is true.
I have had two tornadoes come thru my area since I installed it. One in Apr 2011 and one earlier this year. The second one was real close to my property. So close that when it crossed the lake just across the road from my hill, it picked up fish from the lake and destroyed the marina, it then deposited dead fish and parts of the marina in my yard. I registered 50 to 70+ mph winds on my wind gauge during both events. The Comet came thru both the storms undamaged.
I would buy another one if need be and I recommend them to anyone needing a good working inexpensive yagi for the Magic Band. The price is right and they do as advertised.
G4CZP Rating: 2012-02-27
mechanically poor Time Owned: 6 to 12 months.
I purchased a Comet CA-52HB4 around 1 year ago. Assembly instructions weren't great but managed to get it together OK. Very lightweight, but got it on the mast OK. Used during last summer's sporadic-e season with reasonable results - gain was the best feature; F/B ratio and side lobes not impressive; good SWR match to my Westflex 103. Last December we had some strong winds (but not in excess of the antenna's claimed withstand capability)and the second director broke off. Examination revealed what seemed to be metal fatigue around the mounting hole. First director is now showing similar signs, though still flimsily attached to the boom. I have spent more than 2 months trying to obtain some kind of warranty assistance from Comet, via their UK distributor Nevada, and have just received the offer of a replacement element.
Would I buy another of these - not a chance; I'll go for something a little more solidly put together from a manufacturer who can provide better after sales support.
SM6EVE Rating: 2010-10-12
Mechanically - weak, performance, reverting Time Owned: 0 to 3 months.
Got my Comet CA-52HB4 together with my GHF/50MHz< IC-7200 two years ago. Never got around to try 6 until now. It installed w/o problems but you need a surgeon's hands not to damage those fragile parts. And where did Comet buy that SO-239? It doesn't have the same threads as the "normal" SO-239. The PL-259 gets stuck halfway up the threads, leaving a play between the earth surfaces inside the connection. Will have to introduce a thin-walled washer to make up for that play. As for performance, nothing much heard yet on the band. But it exhibits a normal yagi behavior when listening to OZ7IGY beacon. (300 kms south).
KD7DCR Rating: 2010-08-14
It works...It works... Lifespan unsure in the Rocky Mtns. Time Owned: 0 to 3 months.
The 6m bug bit on May 28th...had to get something that was "tuned" for 6M in the air for the June contest.
Many suggested another (M2) product. The cost factor caused me to try this one first/this yr.

Very light in weight - this is NOT some 100 mph model so don't even consider it for high wind locations! The entire, assembled, antenna weighs maybe 4.5 to 5 pounds!

The assembly is by way of "many" wing-nut stove bolts, all STAINLESS STEEL btw. EVerything is pre-drilled and pre-measured for immediate operation. I set mine for the SSB portion, centered at 50125. The light weight allows for the use of a very small rotor, i.e., a TV rotor - which I have used so far without problem. It is designed to mount to any mast from 1" to 2.25", as is this class of rotor. I managed to put it at about 40ft above ground level.

It has played very well from up here in the Rocky Mtn's, at 6,000ft elevation. Only running 100 watts, which is normal for 6M stations, when the band is open, this antenna shows excellent directivity - and, in some cases, that similar to the StepIR design, being "reversable" in direction, without any switch~! I can only attribute this exhibited capability to the unusual driven-element design/matching system. I have experienced this 5 or 10 times now. Making a series of contacts in the "main" direction, and have stations start showing up off the backside with nearly the same RST, while others "off to the side" are noticably "down" in the RST. With this band acting as it does...this is a "nice" thing in my estimation...unexpected, but neat.

All in all...for a yagi on get your money's worth. As for longivity during some arctic winter blasts...we will have to see come Jan/Feb... Our strongest winds to date, at this location, recorded are 50 mph...@25ft. At 40 ft elevation this antenna is still "in the trees" where it is... AND, if I replace it sometime, I will have an excellent ROVER or PORTABLE operation 4-el antenna for 6M; that is easy to put up and take down with your fingers! Listen for DN35 on the air during any openings to the NW.
VE6CPP Rating: 2008-10-23
Works Well Time Owned: 6 to 12 months.
I needed an Antenna for 6M.. Mostly for use with WSJT Meteor Scatter..and for the number of SSB openings on E Skip I was told about.. did not want to spend a Bundle just to try the band. I found the Comet is fairly light-weight in construction as compared to most yagis I have put together. It does look like it would be 'Very Suitable' for Field Day and /p Op's.. assembles quickly with the 'wing nuts used'! For a $100 Yagi.. I gave it a 4.. but in performance, a 5! Run a 150W Mirage thru it with no problems.. and with only a few openings I have had in '08.. should be close to 100 Grids worked! As with the Review below.. I too live in a High Wind Area of S AB.. and it has survived fine in the past 10 months it has been up! Easy and In-expensive way to get 4el up on 6M! I am thinking about a 2nd one to Phase in.. and use for /p Ops next E Opening!
Jerry VE6CPP VE6Jee/p
KC0LOE Rating: 2008-10-10
Works well for the price Time Owned: 3 to 6 months.
Ever since I became a ham I wanted to get on six meters. This spring I finally took the plunge and bought the equipment to do so. When I first took the antenna out of the box, I noticed there were no instructions, just a diagram of the antenna. It took me about 1/2 a day to figure out how it went together(never put a beam together before).

After I had it assembled and raised, It was time to try this baby out. I made several contacts on the east coast and Canada on the first night I turned it on. I was lucky enough to land in the middle of an opening.

The antenna is pretty durable. The wind here in South Dakota can get pretty fierce. It was survived several nights with 40+ MPH sustained winds. The only thing I would change, would be that clamp that attaches the antenna to the mast. It could be one size bigger in diameter for better survivability in a major storm.

Over all the antenna is a good performer for the price. Comet needs to put better instructions in the box, and make the mast clamp more sturdy.
F5DQK Rating: 2006-01-23
Comet/Diamond comparaison Time Owned: 0 to 3 months.
Thoughts about HB9CV capacitorless four elements:

Last autumn 2005 I bought both models Comet CA-52HB4 and Diamond A-504HB in order to compare them.
Because of lack of winter propagation, I'll wait next summer for trying them on air.
So I did mount them and try in my loft
Both have about same boom length (respectively 3,13 and 3,25 m).
1st impression is that Diamond is stronger build:
The A-504HB diam 12.7 mm unique elements are stronger than the CA-52HB4 ones with their 11 and 9.5 mm diameter.
Also Diamond's 32 mm boom diam instead of Comet's 25 mm confirms me this impression.
Diamond gamma tapering is immediately visible. So you have to spend a little time for the Comet one
(no mark for it), especially if you don't have any idea of the gamma prepositionning.

Serial capacitance is substitued in these models by 2 parallel wires : one between both gammas, and the other for dipole to reflector "earth"continuity
Gain of 7.8 dBd seems a little exagerate ! Mmana simulation gives 7.14 dB maxi with a 52 pF serial capacitance, but 5.8 dB without !!
Perhaps a little problem with Mmana, because I was obliged to carefully adjust gamma wire diameters and distance from the boom.
Front to back ratio of 17 dB is easy achieved..

I hope having more on air news next summer !!
JAMES_BENEDICT_EX_N8FVJ Rating: 2002-05-19
Low Cost- Needs Mech Upgrade Time Owned: 0 to 3 months.
I purchased the Comet #CA-52HB4 for 6 meters. My Cushcraft 50A-3 has been a solid performer, but some 6 meter FM repeaters showed up in my area. The issue is the Cushcraft is a narrow band design presenting an unacceptable well over 2 to 1 SWR at 53 Mhz. My options was a seperate vertical antenna or the expensive multi-band Cushcraft ALS-670 Log Periodic ($249) including a loss of 2dB gain as compared to the 50A-3! I wanted one antenna plus the convenience of a directional antenna on 6 FM. Vertical vs horizontal gain is not a concern on 6 meters. The Comet offers a gain of 10.4dBi and a SWR of 1.5 or less from 50.0 to 53.5 mHz. Electrically the antenna is well designed, however some poor mechanical details were evident. The tiny 'spaghetti noodle' sized mast clamp would never keep the antenna secured in the proper direction at my windy QTH. I machined a 3" x 8" #7 gauge aluminum plate and clamped it to the mast. This was easy as the center mast clamp Comet provides has a flat surface, thus removes clamping stress from the mast. I drilled four more holes and used two muffler clamps to secure the antenna to my 2" antenna mast. The next issue was the Comet coax connector has a slightly larger diameter than standard. This does not allow the ground side of the coax to be electrically secure. I used a 90 degree adapter, soldered the threaded 'slip ring' (align this up before soldering), then screwed the adapter on the antenna coax connector. Now, I have a solid ground connection. The antenna does appear to be rugged enough for the ice storms and high winds at my QTH. I will not say overly built, but 'just enough'. Comet refers to this antenna as a light weight design usable for a temporary base station. My modifications make the antenna a permanent base station design. Due to the coax connector and 'weak' mast clamp, I give the antenna a 3.0 rating. Performance receives a 5.0 rating and overall design strength a 4.0 rating. Overall, the Comet CA-52HB4 receives a 4.0 rating. If this was a $200+ antenna, I would have been unhappy. At the $119.00 + shipping, I can live with it!
K0XXX Rating: 2001-08-28
Wide Banded & Easy Construction Time Owned: 3 to 6 months.
The antenna has no written instructions (only pictures) however, construction was easy and straight forward.

Using a MFJ analyzer to check it, the VSWR was nearly flat across the entire band. It started increasing at about 53.7MHz but still did not get higher than 1.7.

The only complaint I have is that one of the holes for mounting the elements to the boom was not aligned with the others. But, it was close enough that about 15 seconds with the Dremel tool fixed the problem.

Overall, I am very satisfied with the antenna and may purchase a second one for stacking (which may require a modification to the mounting hardware).