Manager


Manager - NA4M
Manager Notes

Reviews For: WinRadio 1550e External computer interface receiver

Category: Receivers: General Coverage

eMail Subscription

Registered users are allowed to subscribe to specific review topics and receive eMail notifications when new reviews are posted.
Review Summary For : WinRadio 1550e External computer interface receiver
Reviews: 8MSRP: 549
Description:
0.5 - 2 gigahertz coverage, all modes, additional receiver functions added by downloads to software
Product is in production
More Info: http://www.winradio.com
# last 180 days Avg. Rating last 180 days Total reviews Avg. overall rating
1083.4
WB0KWJ Rating: 2025-01-05
Obsolete hardware/software. Middling receive. Obtuse protocol. Time Owned: 0 to 3 months.
The WiNRADiO 1550e is a headless software-controlled receiver that came out about 1999. It covers 150 kHz to 1500 MHz in CW, USB, LSB, FM-narrow, and FM-wide modes. The USA version excludes cellular frequencies by default. It was designed to run on DOS, Windows 98, and MacOS Classic. There were a wide variety of expensive accessory applications available in the early 2000s for scanning, signal analysis, and other purposes. The manufacturer offered support for building APIs to connect various program to the main software. In contrast, the maker provided little technical information about the radio itself, including its control protocol. The WiNRADiO 1550e may be seen as comparable to the ICOM-PCR 1000.

As a receiver, the WR-1550e is a middling performer, with reasonable (but not good) sensitivity, poor adjacent-signal rejection, and is prone to intermodulation. Its manufacturer claims about 0.3uV sensitivity across most of its range for SSB/CW for a 10dB S/N. In side-by-side comparisons, the ICOM PCR-1000 appears to be more sensitive and better at nearby signal rejection. The speaker output is 0.2 watts.

This is a software-controlled radio rather than a software-defined radio. That means it's a standard receiver controlled by software via a serial RS-232 or PCMCIA connection. The software supplied with the radio, WINRADIO.EXE (still available on the manufacturer's website), was apparently designed for Windows 98SE, and has not been updated. It will not install or run on modern Windows systems. The Macintosh software is similarly ancient, and designed to run in the old "Classic" environment (e.g., OS9, pre-OSX). It will not run natively on any modern Mac. There are reports that the Windows software will run on Windows 7, and under Windows 7 in emulation--although Windows XP is probably the latest version for reliable use. I was unable to get the WINRADIO.EXE to install at all on Windows 7. There is an available DOS application, DOSRADIO.EXE, which can be made to work under DOSBOX-X on Windows. I was able to get DOSRADIO.EXE to install and run on DOSBOX-X on a Mac. Unfortunately, due to an apparent bug in DOSBOX-X for Mac, the program could not see the serial port.

It should be noted that DOSRADIO.EXE is a command-line program. However, the control commands listed in the online manual do not correspond to the commands accepted by the program. The actual command protocol is helpfully listed by the program when you attempt to use the commands from the manual. As for ports, only COM1-4 are available in the software, with COM1 an apparent default. To get any of these programs to work on modern systems, you will need a USB-Serial converter and might need to redirect port assignments.

DOSRADIO.EXE seems highly limited, offering only basic functions, such as frequency, volume, and mode control. However, that's basically all that's offered by the main program, WINRADIO.EXE, in its graphical user interface. This reveals the reality of the 1550e. It hardly does anything more, by itself, than receive. There are no built in filters or DSP. No DTMF or CTCSS either. Scanning and everything else seems to be done externally, in software. If there are native scanning, memory, and other functions available in the radio, I was unable to find them. So, for filters, the best you get is about 2.5 kHz in SSB/CW mode. DSP is not even an option. According to the instructions generated by DOSRADIO.EXE itself, you should be able to control the BFO frequency. But, the DOS software doesn't seem to work, defaulting the BFO to preset values.

The manufacturer offers extensive API support for creating links to other applications, such as Visual Basic. In contrast to the extensive information about APIs, there seems to be no published service manual, nothing about the control protocol, and no available schematics. The only clues to the 1550E control protocol are found in the source files for the DOSRADIO program. These reveal a problem for anyone hoping to use the radio: you cannot directly control the 1550E with relatively simple serial commands as you can with the PCR-1000. What should be done with embedded control software--the complex calculations to set up the PLL and other circuits--is done externally. Iterative matrix algebra is used (unnecessarily) to set the frequency. Much simpler math can do the same thing. Another calculation is required to set the BFO frequency. Yet another calculation, this one digital, to pull control bits from parameter byte, is required to set the internal detectors. Basically, you're figuring out the parameters for the PLL, detectors, and filters, and then sending them to the radio encoded (by another set of calculations) into a 14-byte string. Fortunately, the volume, mute, and few other things can be set directly.

Just to give you a feel of the issue, here's the C code (it's all in C) to calculate the "R" and "nTOT" values for the PLL to use to set the operating frequency. (This is just part of the code in just one file. There are 13(!) more C files, with similar content, in the DOS package).

static int GetVcoParams(int hRadio, DWORD fvco, DWORD fref, int minR, int maxR, UINT *R, DWORD *Ntot)
{
double Kn, Kp, af;
MATRIX M, tM, cM;
int i;
UINT tR;
DWORD tN, raf;

Kn = (double)fvco / fref;
M[0][0] = 0;
M[0][1] = 1;
M[1][0] = 1;
M[1][1] = (long)Kn;
Kp = modf(Kn, &Kn);
memcpy(tM, M, sizeof(MATRIX));
while ((Kp > 1e-6) && (M[0][1] < maxR))
{
Kn = 1 / Kp;
tM[1][1] = (long)Kn;
memcpy(cM, M, sizeof(MATRIX));
M[0][0] = cM[0][0] * tM[0][0] + cM[0][1] * tM[1][0]; // M = cM * tM - matrix multiplication
M[0][1] = cM[0][0] * tM[0][1] + cM[0][1] * tM[1][1];
M[1][0] = cM[1][0] * tM[0][0] + cM[1][1] * tM[1][0];
M[1][1] = cM[1][0] * tM[0][1] + cM[1][1] * tM[1][1];
Kp = modf(Kn, &Kn);
}
if (M[0][1] > maxR)
memcpy(M, cM, sizeof(MATRIX));
*R = M[0][1];
while (*R < minR)
*R += M[0][1];
*Ntot = M[1][1] * *R / M[0][1];
Kp = (double)*Ntot / *R;
af = Kp * fref;
raf = (long)(af + 0.5) - fvco;
if (labs(raf) > 50)
for (i = 1; i < 25; i++)
{
if (modf(Kp * i + 1e-10, &Kn) < 1e-6)
{
Kn = 50 / i;
if (raf > 0)
GetVcoParams(hRadio, (long)(af - Kn), fref, minR, maxR, &tR, &tN);
else
GetVcoParams(hRadio, (long)(af + Kn + 1.0), fref, minR, maxR, &tR, &tN);
fvco = (long)(tN / tR * fref + 0.5) - fvco;
if (abs(raf) > labs(fvco))
{
*R = tR;
*Ntot = tN;
raf = fvco;
}
break;
}
}
return raf;
}

A different calculation is used for wide-FM. These values are further processed and encoded. You need to read the PLL from the radio to then calculate the values to set the filters. This is the hex string that tells the radio to tune to 145 MHz and set the right detectors and filter:

6D 2C 6E 00 48 6F 2A 6C 33 F0 4E F1 31 93

Mode is a separate command, as is setting the BFO, if you need it. In CW and SSB, there's an unexplained frequency offset of +13kHz to consider, as well. On the PCR-1000, in contrast, you set the frequency, mode, and filters with a single command with straightforward values which could be sent with a batch file:

K0 0145000000 05 02 00 . (this would be 145MHz FM, 15kHz filter)

You can probably see why there are several non-OEM controllers for the ICOM PCR-1000 and nothing for the WiNRADiO 1550e. HAMLIB supposedly supports it--it's in the list--but not actually. Perhaps there are customers who need the customization of the PLL parameters that this system offers. None of that seems to be offered through the software, however, bringing us back to the question of why these calculations were not embedded.

In sum, in its time, the WR-1550e was an expensive, but feature-limited, computer-controlled wideband radio, inferior in most ways to competitors such as the ICOM PCR-1000. Extensive software packages were available to make up for some its native limitations. None of the software necessary to operate the radio runs on modern systems, except potentially under emulation. I could get only DOSRADIO to work, even with emulation. There seems to be extensive support for the radio on the manufacturer's site. But it is of limited value now. As noted before, the site appears to offer nothing technical about the radio or its control protocol. Multiple inquires made via the manufacturer's site for information have gone unanswered. There is almost nothing useful about it on the internet, either. So, you're pretty-much entirely on your own. That makes this radio something to avoid, except perhaps by tinkerer's who are well-versed in C who want to try to reconstruct the control protocol from the DOSWINDOWS source files. I got mine for $50, which is probably more than it is actually worth. If you need a medium performance wide-band computer controlled receiver, get a modern SDR.
WAYNE349 Rating: 2006-07-02
Not as good as PCR1000 Time Owned: 0 to 3 months.
Having already happily owned a PCR1000 using TalkPCr i thought i give a new Winradio 1550e a go after reading many good and some bad reviews about it. First impressions was it was well built and solid but more pricey than the PCR1000 but it's performance was very ordinary for me - on HF am & SSB frequencies the radio sounded 'busy' and noisier than the PCR1000 even on the discone i would imaginge this would of been even worse if i hooked it up to a reasonable longwire.
In the range 65Mhz to 80Mhz & 120Mhz to 140Mhz searching and reception was impossible because of intermodulation products from strong high powered nearby (<20klms) FM radio stations. To be a little more fairer to the 1550e other receivers i've had including Realistic Pro-2021 & Pro-2006, AOR AR3000A and a Uniden Bearcat UBC9000XLT all had the same intermodulation issues when hooked upto the Discone, apart from the PCR1000 the only other receiver that has'nt been affected was the Standard Communications AX-700, that receiver could even handle a 20Db preamp and still had no problems with overloading. Also on the AM band the Winradio 1550e was overloaded with local stations splashing upto 50khz either side so you were unable to hear weaker ones 50 khz or less way and putting on the attenuator made it too deaf to hear anything anyway only the local ones causing the problems, the PCR1000 has no problems with the local AM stations and can easily hear weaker ones only 30khz away and not get splashed to bits, VLF was a complete disaster on the Winradio with barely any beacons heard due to intermodulation from the AM radio stations, the PCR1000 is far superior with barely any intermodulation effecting reception and beacons 120 miles away could be heard cleary during the daytime just using the discone antenna.
I quickly sold the Winradio 1550e and continued to happily use my PCR1000, the only place the 1550e would be any good is a remote location away from strong nearby transmitters or used only on it's own antenna or maybe i had a dude one ?
LC3LCT Rating: 2003-07-11
Great radio Time Owned: 0 to 3 months.
Good range, excellent software, great features, huge amount of plugins, calibration heaven.
It's a great radio for scanning or just listening to the emergency services.
Also great for diagnosing radio signals, receiving fax and other digital modes, and logging traffic.
I was choosing between PCR-1000 and this and am happy with my choice.
Would I buy it again? You bet I would, almost concidering getting a second one.
KMA247 Rating: 2003-04-03
Wow - Almost perfect! Time Owned: 6 to 12 months.
Glad I bought it in stead of the ICOM. I love the XRS plug-ins and I was not disappointed with the trunkng software. It has already solved issues here at the shop.
3BEF3 Rating: 2003-02-24
Class of its own Time Owned: 6 to 12 months.
This is an excellent receiver, ground-breaking in many respects. The excellent software does not have a competition at this point of time. The Icom PCR-1000 which appears pitched head-on against the WR-1550e lacks severely in software, although it comes closer in hardware. The WR-1550e however beats the PCR-1000 with its higher sensitivity, better selectivity, faster scanning speed, and an extended frequency range.




LC2AAT Rating: 2002-02-27
Outperforms PCR1000 by a 1/1000 inch Time Owned: 0 to 3 months.
I have the opportunity to compare WiNRADiO WR-1550e side-by-side with the ICOM IC-PCR1000, and the WR-1550e generally is a little better than the IC-PCR1000 on all bands (LW-UHF) except on the 6m and 70 cm and the 900 MHz bands where the IC-PCR1000 was a little better.
Selectivity is better than the IC-PCR1000, but unfortunately you can't select the selectivity. (Yet! I expect a plugin to be available soon for this.)
Sensitivity is also better than the IC-PCR1000 except on the bands stated above.
Both the IC-PCR1000 and the WR-1550e is good receivers, but can't perform miracles.

If you are able to read Norwegian I have a comprehensive review on my homepage:
http://iserit.greennet.gl/storli/test_av_computer_styrte_radioer.htm
It deals with using these receivers for SWL, HAM (HF/VHF/UHF), FMDXing, WXSAT, scanning and other topics.
WA2PGI Rating: 2002-01-13
hear birdie birdie Time Owned: more than 12 months.
First off I hate to write a negative review of anyones product.But this one I think needs to be addressed. I have owned the Winradio 1000i and 1550i & 1550E. I also have owned the Icom PCR100 & 1000 models. Summary of ALL the Winradios is as follows;
Highs: Software is easy to use
Front panel Interface is Great
Spectrum Analyzer works very well
All of the above much better than Icom's PC radios

Lows: Horrible performance overall
No adjustable Filters
High amounts of IMod present all bands
Weak Adjacent Channel Rejection
Sensitivity generally poor

I tested this radio along with the other recievers I have with at least 8 antennas from long wires to cut band yagis to yagi log periodics.
My opinion (as if you don't already know), is that this radio is too expensive and gives very poor perfromance, but if you want to listen to FM radio on your computer for $550! Then this is your radio.
KA1RI Rating: 2001-05-24
Fantastic radio! Time Owned: 0 to 3 months.
Easy software installation and hookup. "Front panel" much cleaner and easier to use than Icom PCR-1000! Many modules which enhance the receiver software are available free from the winradio web site. A new "front panel" interface was recently uploaded and is also available free. Excellent workmanship. Very intuitive controls. Excellent performance! Highly recommended!!