| W0EAJ |
Rating:    |
2009-06-30 | |
| The Good, Bad, & Ugly |
Time Owned: more than 12 months. |
I own 1 ATAS100 & 2 ATAS120's - in my estimation, the 100 is the better antenna, owning to it's MUCH BETTER weatherizing (such as it is).
I installed a longer whip in mine from a Larson 5/8 2m antenna (drill the top hole out to a #99 drill), which doesn't require as much coil to stick up as with the original whip - yes, you lose the top end coverage, but for 40m, it's not beating the heck out of the coil contact-balls & so-called springs.
Both antennas have weaknesses; this said, as I work on MANY of them. The internal plastic follower (rides on the threaded rod) is very flimsy, and is prone to breakage, especially when the antenna goes into "search" and continues to turn at full TOP or full BOTTOM, before reversing; quite often, the follower will break in two, and a new part is required, as well as a complete tear-down for installation.
The lower coil end has a marked propensity for breaking off of the lower metal collar at it's solder connection, and it's quite a job to disassemble the 120 to fix this - the 100 is easier, but still a pain. As if this weren't enough, the outer protective collar that lets moisture OUT, also lets moisture and road-spray IN, which corrodes the coil contact-balls and aluminum carrier for them (the ball-springs are NOT tempered, and get loose).
The coup d' gras, is that the center contact pin which goes into the mount, is on average .008 inch TOO SMALL for adequate contact with most mounts or SO-239 (which it's based on)... why Yaesu didn't notice this is beyond me.
I use both the 100 & 120 with an IC-706/706MKIIG & HB control boxes on two different vehicles, and they work well - you just have to service them from time-to-time. |
|
| KJ4AUQ |
Rating:      |
2009-01-23 | |
| Great if Properly Grounded |
Time Owned: 0 to 3 months. |
| I have had this antenna mounted on my Tacoma PU for three months now. Used about 10ft of grounding strap to ground chassis to frame and bed. Grounded muffler. Grounded bed on all four corners. 5/9 reports on all bands it works. Use hamsticks on 75 and 60. SWR 1.5 to 1.0 or lower on all bands it will work. If you do not plan to ground everything that moves on your vehicle, your performance is not going to be that great on any antenna you install mobile. The more grounding, the better it and your radio will work. |
|
| K2GK |
Rating:      |
2008-12-12 | |
| Not bad at all |
Time Owned: more than 12 months. |
Every bit as good as the Hustler. My buddy has the Hustler(s) on his station wagon, I have the Atas 120A on my Mountaineer. We meet at lunch time in the same park and work the same people and get the same reports. But I don't get wet leaving the car to change coils.HA HA Larry!!!!
Plus I can change bands while driving with one finger one touch. Oh well
I would buy another if this one died.
73 de k2gk
|
|
| W3RXO |
Rating:   |
2008-11-25 | |
| Fair antenna, but not too many that are as small, & any better |
Time Owned: more than 12 months. |
Well, this antenna is marginal, at best, for me. It has done a nice job, making contacts, from the western states to Japan, Costa Rica, Mexico, Brazil and several pacific islands, as well as many of the 50 states, including HI and AK. BUT, it is NOT a very good antenna for VHF and UHF. It attenuates the incoming signals, badly and while I am able to hit good repeaters, it is weak, at best, for use in these bands.
As far as HF goes, MAKE SURE IT IS VERY WELL GROUNDED. Even if you think it is, it probably isn't grounded well enough. Right now, mine has a good chassis ground on a big rig, and still gives me fits on 17 meters and 40 meters, also, sometimes on 6 meters. I have no issues with 20, 15, 12 and 10, and usually it works well on 6. But Rarely, can I get a good outgoing signal on 17, or 40.
It has it's uses, but, is a marginally good antenna. Not awful, but, not a shining star, either. If you like a good challenge, and don't mind fussing with things, it might be up your alley. |
|
| W4KVW |
Rating:   |
2008-11-15 | |
| POOR EXCUSE! |
Time Owned: 6 to 12 months. |
| I had one with a Yaesu 857D & it was NOT impressive for sure.6 & 17 meters were the best bands for me & NEITHER was very good.It would run UP & DOWN & UP & DOWN sometimes 2 or 3 times before finding a match.Compared to my other HF mobile antennas(DK-3,Hustler,& Hamsticks)it is a POOR EXCUSE for an HF mobile antenna.I posted a review here before on this antenna but for some reason it has been deleted?At best this would serve as an EMERGENCY use antenna & it is NOT worth the purchase price.It was a HAPPY day for me getting rid of BOTH the Atas-120A & the Yaesu 857D.I am NOW a VERY "HAPPY" ICOM 7000 & Hustler antenna user in my mobile setup! }:>) |
|
| W4LGH |
Rating:     |
2008-11-15 | |
| Good Performer |
Time Owned: 0 to 3 months. |
For performance this antenna would get a 5/5, but it is a very contrary antenna. It sometimes goes goofy, and will run all the way up or down trying to find itself. It is well made, but earlier versions were pledged with water problems, causing early failure. However I have always been able to fix the problems and get it working again. Now I have the 120/A model. Still a 5/5 on performance for such a small antenna. Will have to "Wait and See" if they fixed the water problem. The 120/A model still gets itself lost once in a while, but using the manual tune buttons, you can quickly get it back on track. Because of this, it only gets a 4/5. Was hoping they would have fixed that problem too.
I will also say, that I took the "A" model apart to see what changes were made, and a lot of the plastic parts in the 100/120 have been upgraded to heavier NYLON parts, which should help. The Florida heat and sun worked pretty hard on the older plastic parts, so we'll see what happens with the nylon. All in all it looks as though Yaesu has gine in the right direction to make improvements to it. |
|
| KE3HAY |
Rating:      |
2008-10-31 | |
| Not a Bad peice of Work |
Time Owned: 0 to 3 months. |
I have a 2002 Mazda Millenia and I needed something to put on a trunk lip mount. On my car, everything is a compromise so I didn’t see the need to spend, $400 on a tarheel, $250 for a auto tune thing, $200 for some fabricated metal so the small antenna would stay put cause its heavy and not the XYL is really T'ed off because I have sunk $800+ into an antenna that will get me a 5/7 vs 5/5?
I have read lots of posts from people talking about this antenna and how much of a dummy load and so for and so on about how bad it is.
Let me say this, I don’t care what you put on a 4 door sedan, you will never ever be a 5/9 to everyone you talk too.
If you have the luxury of driving a pick up, then a bigger antenna would work best
If you are looking for an antenna for a sedan or small auto that doesn’t T off the XYL, that will tune quickly with proper grounding than this antenna will do the Job.
Bottom line, with the ATAS system, it works. No it won’t tune 80M and it sucks on 2M simplex but the antenna was not designed for that. It was meant to be an antenna that tunes multiple HF bands, on a light trunk mounted frame for the Yaesu series that allowed one touch tuning w/ out the need for an expensive counter or tuner. Most of all its affordable at $299 shipped from HRO. the mount may cost you $75 bucks but it beats $800 all day ... OH did i forget to mention you dont need extra power cables caring the possibility of RF issues to run it because its power is in the COAX itself?
As far as the quality is concerned, TLC as with anything and it should last. |
|
| W4USA |
Rating:      |
2008-10-12 | |
| Nice N Easy |
Time Owned: more than 12 months. |
This is my second ATAS. Works well, the other ATAS 100 is almost 10 years old first issue and still works well. One button tune is great.
The most convient HF mobile antenna for a Yeasu. |
|
| KI4CRA |
Rating:      |
2008-10-09 | |
| Still a great antenna |
Time Owned: 6 to 12 months. |
Well having used/owned one for almost a year now, I gotta say that this has been a great mobile motorized antenna. For me, I only work 40-6 meters anyway, I have found no issues what so ever. This antenna will actually tune 17 & 12 meters, found this out when I tuned 17 meters and heard VP6DX on the air. I called he heard me the first time and I made the contact. Another nice aspect of this antenna is that not only is it compatible with the FT-857, but several other rigs as well, including but not limited to; FT-897, FT-100, and the new FT-450.
True, you can only put a max of 200 watts through it, but for an antenna it size I would be suprised if you would be able to do much more than 300 watts. If you want an antenna that can take the heat go with one of the other manufacturers, there are several nice ones on the market.
I have tuned 40-6 meters with this antenna, including 6 & 10 meter FM with great results. I'm sure those who have had problems are not happy about having a $300 antenna go belly up on them, so with all due respect I will not go into that here, this isn't the place for it. I have had not just mobile antennas, but base HF antennas go belly up, I know I wasn't a happy camper. But for me this is still one great antenna. See ya on the air!
73 de Mark
AI4HO |
|
| JDEVARIE |
Rating:      |
2008-10-09 | |
| Great so far! |
Time Owned: 3 to 6 months. |
I have had my antenna for a few months now on my car. I mounted it to a K-400 type lip mount and I am using a FT857 with it. Initially it would not move at all while pressing the tune button. I found out I had grounding problems. I discovered that grounding the lip mount bracket was not enough. I had to remove SO39 connector from the bracket and remove the anodizeed paint where the connector contacts the bracket. I also grounded the part of the bracket that the connector sits on instead of just the bracket itself. Note that these brackets are articulated thus a ground connection to the car body is compromised.
Once I did all this, the antenna works very well. I have had some dx contacts to FR5 and EA7 easilly on 20m and 17m plus some stateside contacts on 40m as far as California from the Boston area. If you ask me, not too shabby.
Now, I read all the problems some have been having with this antenna and I am a little worried that mine might fail in some time. Anyways, I cannot predict the future lol.
Overall a very convenient antenna, much more eye pleasing than a tarheel or high sierra. I don't care about running high power in my car nor do I care of 75m mobile (has never worked well for me regardless of the antenna used).
Expensive but interesting antenna. |
|