Manager


Manager - NA4M
Manager Notes

Reviews For: Ultra Beam Yagi 2 el 6-20m

Category: Antennas: HF: Yagi, Quad, Rotary dipole, LPDA

eMail Subscription

Registered users are allowed to subscribe to specific review topics and receive eMail notifications when new reviews are posted.
Review Summary For : Ultra Beam Yagi 2 el 6-20m
Reviews: 4MSRP: 1930,00 Euro
Description:
Dynamic yagi 2 elements 6-20m
Product is in production
More Info: http://www.ultrabeam.it
# last 180 days Avg. Rating last 180 days Total reviews Avg. overall rating
0044.5
G0CGL Rating: 2024-02-23
Disappointing issues with new manufacturer/supplier Time Owned: more than 12 months.
Ultrabeam of Italy no longer manufacture and supply this range of antennae. They are now made by WIMo of Germany who are also the sole supplier. Ultrabeam of Italy were renowned for high quality antennae (see all the pre-2019 reviews on eHam). However, as you will read below, WIMo struggle to match them.

My reason for purchasing was that a trusty Hexbeam succumbed to a vicious storm in February 2019, necessitating in a re-think of antenna selection. Given that I have only a light-weight telescopic mast, albeit well guyed, I was limited by size and weight. Eventually I settled on a choice between an Ultrabeam and the Steppir equivalent. Steppir antennas have a more complex construction (the manual is three times the size of the Ultrabeam manual), and the controller appears not to be as good. So Ultrabeam was my choice. Steppir are slightly less expensive but the control cable and transceiver interface are extra costs whilst both these items are included with the Ultrabeam.

My purchase was not without several critical issues. There is no warranty document. Of course, there is a warranty but WIMo do not overtly stand behind their products. There is no contents list, this omission making any difficulty with construction difficult to resolve because it is impossible to know if you are dealing with correct parts. As it was, I had a wrong mast/boom plate supplied but I thought it was not the plate that was wrong but the U-bolts, blocks and other mounting hardware. In the box was the manual, consisting of loose A4 paper, not even in a wrapper or folder. For nearly 2000 euro this is poor and does not instil a sense of quality. The manual boasts of its simplicity to complement the “simplicity of construction”. But this taken too far. Take an A4 sheet consisting of copious text and 7 photos and you can imagine that these photos are not going to be very large and with poor definition. I had to email WIMo several times regarding the wrong part and how to correctly mount the EHUs to the boom. They sent me a much more detailed picture that instantly solved the EHU problem and which should be an extra page in the manual. For the sake of just one sheet of paper, this omission is an unnecessary oversight.

Notwithstanding the above construction issues, which caused a two-week delay while waiting for the proper part to be sent and arrive, construction was easy enough once the detailed picture was provided. The metal materials are claimed to be all stainless steel but after 3 weeks in the air, rust appeared on the EHU case washers. The fiberglass elements, that house the moving tapes, are strong but do flex in even moderate wind which creates a fluctuating SWR. Probably this is nothing to be concerned with in practice but I wonder if the Steppir does the same.

The controller is a nice looking, color, touch-screen unit that has a well-appointed menu and many features. Supplying CAT to it was simple so that the antenna could follow the radio VFO. It will allow ‘daisy-chaining’ if you only have an option for one CAT cable but also have another CAT dependent device like an amplifier. The supplied controller was marred by a badly finished case, it being covered by blotches caused by fingerprints put on it during manufacturing or packing. These should have been cleaned off at the time but were now etched into the case, preventing their complete removal even with a proprietary cleaner. The controller manual makes only a single reference to a 'PC Program' without explanation. There is in fact a downloadable MS Windows applet, much like the SPE amplifier software, with which you can see a graphical representation of the controller panel and operate the antenna from a PC via a USB connection. It uses Omnirig to get CAT information and works very well. The controller also comes on when power resumes from a wall socket, making remote operation very straightforward. Beware though that the unit powers up after a power outage and therefore needs unplugging if being left unused and unattended for any length of time.

But now the worst problem and nightmare: The antenna would lose all resonance when using the controller to fine-tune each band’s SWR adjustment, necessitating in ‘calibration’. Even if this corrected the problem, which it did most times but not all, it would be necessary to calibrate again when fine-tuning another band. Other actions also resulted in the total loss of resonance on all bands.

WIMo staff are good at general customer support but seem inept when it comes to supporting this product. Taking over construction and supply has not been accompanied by acquiring knowledge and expertise in working with customers and problem-solving faults in this dynamic antenna. This is alarming. There began a long, protracted episode in trying to get satisfaction for my 2000 Euro outlay. One email from a WIMo staffer asserted "no one would call the antenna not working" in response to my list of complaints. Even more bizarrely, Ultrabeam owners are directed to a 'Troubleshooting' document which details several complex and onerous tests that are expected to be made. I made one of the tests and forwarded the result to WIMo who made no comment. I am now sure that none of the staff there understand the tests let alone the results.

From my initial complaint, it took 3 weeks of numerous emails (and believe me, it was far too many culminating in a threat to escalate the matter) before finally WIMo collected the EHUs, controller and cable for examination. Only the action of Managing Director, Volkmar Junge, got things moving. They found that the controller had been wrongly programmed (for a 40m-6m model instead of my 20m-6m model) and that the internal CI-V board was defective. They made all this good, changed the EHUs’ corroded washers and element tapes, and replaced the controller case. But the new case was scratched on the top, symptomatic of the careless attention by WIMo staff. I considered sending them a picture but since I had suffered for 10 weeks in total, from making payment to having a working product, I thought better of re-opening a very sore wound. On re-constructing and mounting the antenna again, I used an anti-rust compound on all the EHU case screws and washers.

Performance: I am not able to make AB comparisons with another HF antenna in real-time. But it is possible to get a feel for antenna performance. I had my Hexbeam for 7 years and it was an acceptable performer in terms of pile-up breaking. It’s front-to-back ratio was excellent. Although of the ‘broadband’ type, I had to run it through a tuner on wide bands and undoubtedly the forward gain was not uniform across the whole of these bands. The Ultrabeam is optimised for maximum forward gain at the expense of front-to back. It exhibits only 12dB to 15dB rather than the 20dB of the Hexbeam. But, being dynamic, forward gain is uniform across the whole of the bands and it became readily apparent that its performance was superior. Bear in mind though that the Ultrabeam is four times the cost of a Hexbeam.

In summary: the negatives to this antenna are some substandard materials; poor presentation; and WIMo, whose staff are in serious need of training. The understanding of the product by their customer service staff is not good enough. Note though that Volkmar Junge is committed to straightening out all issues and actually his attention to the problems was what separated satisfaction of a sort from seeking a full refund. The positives are that providing WIMo have learnt something from this episode, or you get a working one, you can expect good performance for a 2 element together with ease of construction and wiring, and an attractive and well featured controller. Should you choose Ultrabeam and have issues, I recommend not bothering with the Troubleshooting Guide, or starting dialogue with WIMo staff, but to go direct to WIMo's MD.

--------------------------------------------------

Update after nearly 5 years' ownership: I still have the beam and I still use it everyday. It remains a 3 star product but more than likely it would rate higher for new purchasers. Let me explain.

The original antenna continued to give me problems. The resonance would get out of sync and I had to recalibrate roughly every 4 weeks. The control cable was of poor manufacture and the outer insulation was short of the cable length and, at the both ends, the plug wires were exposed. I did heat-shrink these ends but after 4 years in the air, suddenly I could not change bands. I found that there was water ingress to the cable that had by capillary action flowed to the RCU-06 controller and that in turn had suffered a corroded socket and internals. Basically the cable and the controller were a write-off.

What to do now? Time will tell how stupid or otherwise I have been but I decided to buy another one. There are some notable improvements since 5 years ago. The control cable is different and of far better quality. I did still heat-shrink the ends but it looked watertight to me. The firmware is now upgraded from V4 to V5 and the controller works perfectly. In six months usage I have not had to recalibrate the antenna.

The on-air performance has always been outstanding. I am DXer, always chasing DXpeditions, and rarely do I not work something and neither do I ever feel I am using a 2 element and not a 3 element.

Had this been my first purchase I would rate it 4 stars. I would stop short of 5 stars because not all the hardware is stainless steel and greasing is necessary on the EHU case bolts and protection of the cable from water is, I feel, a needed safeguard. Even though a SteppIR is more expensive, for this price there should not be the need for owner interventions for weather protection.

Notwithstanding periodic checking of the rear of the RCU-06 for dampness, I am optimistic for the longevity of the replacement antenna. Also this time, I did not need to interact with WiMO staff - what a relief.
ON4VP Rating: 2018-02-26
good performer for it size Time Owned: 0 to 3 months.
After I moved to a smaller condo I explored my antenna situation to make the best out of it.
On my older propery I had a tower installed with the 4 element Ultrabeam so I was spoiled.
But where I live now, I have close neighbours and a lot less of space to put up antennas.

I looked at the marked and my first goal was to set up a Hexbeam.
But one of the neighbours started to complain about my plans.
Although the elements are longer 90° off the boom with the Ultrabeam, the boom is only 5 feet (1,62 meters) long allowing me to park it close to the house when the tower is retracted.

Comparing this antenna against most competitors result in same forward gain numbers.
Since Ultrabeam decided to use a director instead of a reflector in combination with the driver the front to back is not great. A 3-element would improve that a lot (or the use of a reflector en no director).

After consulting the company their choise relies on two things, best forward gain and smallest possible boom.
It has been proven to be a good choise. The antenna does a really great job with only two element. Forward gain is as advertised with additional gain raised higher.
While on the back of the antenna the 180° stations still can be loud, the advantage for the operator is to work them like with a dipole and no turning or switching has to be done.
For people that prefer better F/B ratio, the software allows to alter the settings and make the director into a reflector. F/B will improve but forward gain will suffer. Up to you what you prefer.

Completed the antenna weights aprox. 15 kg's so she is easy to install especially since the boom is short and therefore the elements only sit at 80 cm (2,5 feet) form the center.
Nevertheless there's lots of space to use this antenna on towers with elevator systems or retractabe towers like mine.

Ultrabeams are not cheap. The cost of the antenna plus the additional control cable sets you back quiet a bit even for the smallest model.
But the return is great. Good gain, small footprint, 1:1 matched on all operated bands, nothing to worry about using solid state amplifiers.
And with proper software the station can be controlled over the internet, radio, antenna, rotator and amplifier.

As I owned the 4 element for several years without any mechanical or electrical problems and with performance in mind for two elements, I rate it 5.
For those who want a small antenna, still full size elements, matched to the bands and aible to work on 6 bands. You should look at this model.
VK3IDX Rating: 2012-03-28
So far so good! Time Owned: 0 to 3 months.
Being the first Ultrabeam user in Australia, I thought Id post my early observations, and will post a follow up later down the track after extensive use.
1.Logically sequenced,easy to follow instruction manual with useful pics. Could be a little more detailed and without the mispellings, but no issues at all with the assembly.
2.All parts were provided, so nothing missing,but no spares.
3.Assembly took me a casual and relaxed 4 hours,including reading the manual closely.
4.SWR was 1.5 or lower on all bands, and with some slight driven element adjustments all SWR reading are 1.1 on all bands according to my MFJ analyser. Its great being able to tune the antenna from the comfort of my chair and a finger on the controller!
5.Unfortunately I dont have another antenna up to compare it with, but my subjective findings is that it works very well, especially considering that its only about 30 foot high. Il comment more on my next, follow up review.
6.Customer Service provided by the Australian dealer RF Solutions has been excellent.
7.What I really like: High quality throughout ; semi transparent fibreglass elements so it blends in with the sky quite well, also I can see the moving copper inside the element for trouble shooting purposes; Square boom so the elements perfectly line up; I can retract the copper element in case of electrical storms;pre connected cable connectors from the control box to the motors,so plug & play; and not forgetting the interface cable that connects between the control box and my transceiver, so the antenna resonant frequency changes automatically in tune with my VFO.
Yep, so far a satisfied user of my new dynamic antenna system!
IK8TEO Rating: 2011-05-13
Excellent for cwer Time Owned: 0 to 3 months.
Finally SWR 1:1 also in the sub-band telegraphy. The antenna is built with great care as well as its controller.
Ideal in the contest with his non extreme directionality.
Light and robust, revolution the concept of antenna 100 years after its invention.
Greatly recommended for all.
73 de Francesco IK8TEO.